Report
Chubu Electric chiefs to resign over falsified earthquake-risk data, NHK reports
NHK reports that Chubu Electric executives are to resign after allegations that falsified earthquake-risk data was provided to Japan's nuclear regulator during safety reviews.

NHK reports that Chubu Electric chiefs are to quit over nuclear data fraud. The move follows allegations that falsified earthquake-risk data was provided to Japan's nuclear regulator during safety reviews, according to the same report.
Earthquake risk sits at the centre of Japan's nuclear safety reviews, which assess whether a utility's facilities can withstand seismic events. If the allegation holds, the regulator was given incorrect information during that process. That goes to public confidence in nuclear oversight, to the utilities that operate under it, and to the wider debate about Japan's energy mix.
For readers in Japan, this is a governance and safety story rather than an immediate travel advisory. Nothing in the report points to disruption to transport, tourism or daily life. The significance lies in how Japan's nuclear regulator and utilities handle safety data, a long-running issue in the country, and in how utilities are held to account when that data is questioned.
The account is attributed to NHK, which names no executives and gives no timeline for the departures. No detail has emerged on whether the resignations have been accepted or whether any safety reviews will be reopened.
Source details and supporting facts
Each line is stated by the page named above it.
Stated by The Japan Times
- Chubu Electric chiefs are to quit over nuclear data fraud, NHK says.
- The move follows allegations of falsified earthquake-risk data provided to Japan's nuclear regulator.
- The data was provided during safety reviews.
Sources
- The Japan TimesText stored 13 September 2026
How this story was checked. Written from the 1 page listed above, stored 13 September 2026; claims checked against that stored text on 14 September 2026.
What that means
- 3 of 3 reported statements were confirmed against the page that carries them; the rest were removed rather than published.
- Figures in the text were required to appear in the stored source text: yes. Identifiers: yes.
- The check reads stored text only: no claim rests on a fresh look that did not happen.
- Where the reporting was silent, the text says so instead of filling the gap.